Clayton v. Superior Court

131 Cal. App. 619
California Court of Appeal·Decided May 5, 1933·No. Civ. No. 9107·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

The petition for an alternative writ of prohibition is denied.

The respondent court had jurisdiction to hear and determine the motion to dissolve petitioner’s attachment (Truck Owners & Shippers, Inc., v. Superior Court, 194 Cal. 146 [228 Pac. 19]), and this power did not depend upon the correctness of the decision (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1102; Dahlgren v. Superior Court, 8 Cal. App. 622 [97 Pac. 681] ; People v. San Diego, 71 Cal. App. 421 [236 Pac. 377]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clayton v. Superior Court, 131 Cal. App. 619 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

131 Cal. App. 619 (Clayton v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. City of San Diego
236 P. 377 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)
Dahlgren v. Superior Court
97 P. 681 (California Court of Appeal, 1908)
Truck Owners & Shippers, Inc. v. Superior Court
228 P. 19 (California Supreme Court, 1924)