Clayton v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Clayton v. Superior Court

131 Cal. App. 619

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 5, 1933

DocketCiv. No. 9107

StatusPublished

This text of 131 Cal. App. 619 (Clayton v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clayton v. Superior Court, 131 Cal. App. 619 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The petition for an alternative writ of prohibition is denied.

The respondent court had jurisdiction to hear and determine the motion to dissolve petitioner’s attachment (Truck Owners & Shippers, Inc., v. Superior Court, 194 Cal. 146 [228 Pac. 19]), and this power did not depend upon the correctness of the decision (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1102; Dahlgren v. Superior Court, 8 Cal. App. 622 [97 Pac. 681] ; People v. San Diego, 71 Cal. App. 421 [236 Pac. 377]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The petition for an alternative writ of prohibition is denied.

The respondent court had jurisdiction to hear and determine the motion to dissolve petitioner’s attachment (Truck Owners & Shippers, Inc., v. Superior Court, 194 Cal. 146 [228 Pac. 19]), and this power did not depend upon the correctness of the decision (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1102; Dahlgren v. Superior Court, 8 Cal. App. 622 [97 Pac. 681] ; People v. San Diego, 71 Cal. App. 421 [236 Pac. 377]).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 Cal. App. 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clayton-v-superior-court-calctapp-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack