Clayton v. State

17 S.W. 261, 21 Tex. Ct. App. 343, 1886 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 147
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 19, 1886
DocketNo. 4042
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 17 S.W. 261 (Clayton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clayton v. State, 17 S.W. 261, 21 Tex. Ct. App. 343, 1886 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 147 (Tex. Ct. App. 1886).

Opinion

Hurt, Judge.

This is a conviction for carrying a pistol. The proof is clear that appellant, at the time of carrying the pistol, was deputy sheriff of Pease county. Upon this point the court charged, in effect, that if appellant was a peace officer, and was acting as such, under a legal appointment, and that he was in this (Taylor) county, in the discharge of his official business, he should be acquitted; but if in pursuit of his private business, he should be convicted.

■ Counsel for appellant requested a charge to the effect that, if defendant was a deputy sheriff of any county of the State while carrying the pistol, he should be acquitted.

We are of the opinion that the rule stated in the requested charge is the law of the case. A deputy sheriff is a peace officer, and as such is excepted from the operation of Article 318, Penal Code. This is expressly done by Article 319. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Irwin v. State
177 S.W.2d 970 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1944)
Black v. State
85 S.W. 1143 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 S.W. 261, 21 Tex. Ct. App. 343, 1886 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clayton-v-state-texapp-1886.