Clayton v. State

17 S.W. 261, 21 Tex. Ct. App. 343, 1886 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 147
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 19, 1886·No. No. 4042·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hurt, Judge.

This is a conviction for carrying a pistol. The proof is clear that appellant, at the time of carrying the pistol, was deputy sheriff of Pease county. Upon this point the court charged, in effect, that if appellant was a peace officer, and was acting as such, under a legal appointment, and that he was in this (Taylor) county, in the discharge of his official business, he should be acquitted; but if in pursuit of his private business, he should be convicted.

■ Counsel for appellant requested a charge to the effect that, if defendant was a deputy sheriff of any county of the State while carrying the pistol, he should be acquitted.

We are of the opinion that the rule stated in the requested charge is the law of the case. A deputy sheriff is a peace officer, and as such is excepted from the operation of Article 318, Penal Code. This is expressly done by Article 319. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clayton v. State, 17 S.W. 261, 21 Tex. Ct. App. 343, 1886 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 147 (Tex. Ct. App. 1886).

17 S.W. 261 (Clayton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Irwin v. State
177 S.W.2d 970 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1944)
Black v. State
85 S.W. 1143 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1905)