Clayton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Clayton v. State

105 S.W.3d 857, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 749, 2003 WL 21153302

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clayton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 760 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 2003·No. No. ED 81545·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Mark L. Clayton, appeals from the judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Movant contends his counsel was ineffective for assuring him that he would receive only three years for first degree robbery and armed criminal action and this false assurance rendered his guilty plea involuntary.

[858]*858We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. However, we have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their use only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Mark L. Clayton, appeals from the judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Movant contends his counsel was ineffective for assuring him that he would receive only three years for first degree robbery and armed criminal action and this false assurance rendered his guilty plea involuntary.

[858]*858We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. However, we have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their use only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Clayton v. State, 105 S.W.3d 857, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 749, 2003 WL 21153302 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

105 S.W.3d 857 (Clayton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.