Clayton v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Clayton v. State

7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 19, 1931 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 21

Court of Claims of Illinois·Decided November 5, 1931·No. No. 1031·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Now comes Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General, and makes his motion for dismissal, pursuant to an order to show cause entered by this court on the 8th day of September, A. D. 1931, wherein the claimant was ordered to show cause on or before November 3, 1931, why this ease should not be dismissed for want of prosecution.

And it appearing to the court that cause has not been shown by claimant in accordance with said order, it is hereby ordered that the claim be dismissed without an order and the case stricken from the docket.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Now comes Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General, and makes his motion for dismissal, pursuant to an order to show cause entered by this court on the 8th day of September, A. D. 1931, wherein the claimant was ordered to show cause on or before November 3, 1931, why this ease should not be dismissed for want of prosecution.

And it appearing to the court that cause has not been shown by claimant in accordance with said order, it is hereby ordered that the claim be dismissed without an order and the case stricken from the docket.

Clayton v. State, 7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 19, 1931 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 21 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1931).

Pincite

7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 19 (Clayton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.