Clayton v. Standard Oil Co.

42 F. Supp. 734, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2314
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Texas
DecidedDecember 5, 1941
DocketNo. 612
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 42 F. Supp. 734 (Clayton v. Standard Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clayton v. Standard Oil Co., 42 F. Supp. 734, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2314 (S.D. Tex. 1941).

Opinion

KENNERLY, District Judge.

This is a suit in personam by libellants against respondent to recover one-half of their wages as seamen on the Steamship “Beacon”, owned and operated by respondent, on a voyage from Boston, Massachusetts, to Galveston, Texas, which wages were withheld by respondent on the ground that libellants were deserters from the ship, in that they signed on for a coastwise voyage of six months and left the ship at Galveston, Texas, after the completion of the voyage from Boston, Massachusetts, to that port.

The facts are substantially as follows:

(a) On April 13, 1939, libellants signed Shipping Articles for a voyage of not exceeding six months on the S. S. “Beacon”, owned and operated by respondent, reading as follows (signatures omitted):

“Shipping Articles.

“Articles of Agreement between Master and Seamen in the Merchant Service of the United States required by Revised Statutes of the United States Section 4520 [46 U.S.C.A. § 574].

“Port of Boston, Mass. April 13th, 1939

“It Is Agreed between the Master and Seamen, or Mariners, of the S/S ‘Beacon’ of Wilmington, Del. of which Ernest C. Kelson is at present Master, or whoever shall go for Master, now bound from the port of Boston, Mass, to Galveston, Texas, and such other ports and places coastwise as the Master may direct, carrying any kinds of cargo, including petroleum and/or its products in bulk or otherwise, and back to a final port of discharge in the United States, for a term of time not exceeding Six calendar months.

“It is also agreed that:

“(1) Should any of the crew fail to join at the time specified, the Master may ship substitutes at once.

“(2) Seamen and Firemen shall keep their respective forecastles clean, during the voyage, and shall leave them so at the termination of the voyage, under penalty of fine for each case of neglect.

“(3) Eight hours per day shall constitute a working day while in port or at such times when regular watches are not kept.

“(4) The oilers, wipers and coal passers shall wipe down the engines at the end of each passage, whether at anchor or in dock.

“(5) Seamen shall keep the galley supplied with coal, and engineers’ department shall supply the galley with oil.

“(6) No liberty granted other than at the pleasure of the Master.

“(7) No matches of any description to be brought on board by or for any member of the crew; any matches necessary will be supplied by the owners. No naked lights of any description shall be used for any purpose. Smoking is strictly prohibited on board when in port, and is only permitted at sea, and then only in such places as designated by the Master. Any member of the crew infringing the above clauses, or either of them, will be subject to fine.

“(8) Crew to work on day of arrival in final port of discharge until 5 o’clock P. M. (if required).

“(9) The crew under no circumstances are to bring on board liquor or other contraband articles, and if any member of the crew violates this rule, he will become personally liable and subject to any fines imposed, which will be deducted from his wages, and the liquor and other articles of contraband confiscated.

[736]*736“(10) Crew to connect and disconnect cargo and bunker fuel hose whenever necessary.

“(11) Pumpman shall be signed on as pumpman and carpenter combined.

“(12) Sickness contracted by or injury suffered by any member of the ship’s personnel should be reported immediately to the Master or the officer on duty so that medical treatment can be rendered and proper notations thereof entered' in the official log of the vessel.”

(b) When the ship arrived at Galveston, Texas, libellants demanded one-half of their wages, which was paid to them, and afterwards on April 24, 1939, left the ship. They were on that date logged by the master as deserters.

(c) Before leaving the ship, they delivered, or caused to be delivered, to the master a written statement, as follows:

“To the Master of the SS Beacon:

“Dear Sir: We, the unlicensed members of the crew of the SS Beacon respectfully ask you to pay us all wages we have earned and give us our discharges.

“As you know, there is a strike now going on and we consider it dangerous to our safety and to our future employment to continue on this ship, and in addition thereto we wish to call to your attention the general custom on the SS Beacon as well as the other Standard Oil vessels in permitting members of the crew to get off at any American port when on coastwise articles and the corresponding right of the Master to discharge any member of the crew under the same circumstances.

“Yours very truly,

“Edward H. Hughes,

“Ship’s Delegate,

“S.S. Beacon.”

There is no convincing evidence that any of the libellants would have been in any danger, or that their future employment would have been jeopardized, by remaining on the ship. I find .that they would have been safe had they remained on the ship and their future employment would not have been jeopardized by their remaining on the ship. There is no evidence of a general custom, binding on respondent, permitting seamen to leave at any port, such as is mentioned in the statement.

(d) This case has been tried on libellants’ amended libel, filed July 24, 1940. In the original libel, filed April 28> 1939, no reason is stated why libellants left the ship at Galveston, but in the amended libel, libellants claim that at the time the Shipping Articles were executed, there was in effect an agreement for the benefit of the unlicensed personnel on respondent’s ships, and including libellants, between the National Maritime Union, of which libellants are members, and respondent, dated April 1, 1938, which became a part of the Shipping Articles. They claim that this agreement expired during the voyage from Boston to Galveston, and that they were justified in leaving the ship at Galveston, the first port reached after the expiration of such agreement. There is nothing in the Shipping Articles which refers to the agreement, but I think that, taking the record as a whole, it appears, and I find, that it was intended to make the agreement a part of the Shipping Articles. The agreement is dated April 1, 1938, and on its face expires April 1, 1939, and is quoted in the margin.1

Before April 1, 1939, negotiations were begun between the Union and respondent for its renewal, but far-reaching changes were desired by the Union. By mutual [737]*737agreement, it was continued in force, pending such negotiations. On April 13, 1939, the Union terminated the agreement as of date April 17, 1939. During all the negotiations for renewal, respondent was willing to renew the agreement, the disagreement which brought about its termination being with respect to the changes desired by the Union. When respondent was advised of the termination of the agreement, it gave notice to the unlicensed personnel on its ships of its willingness to continue the agreement in effect. The pertinent part of such notice being’ as follows:— “We want every man on our ships to know why we have been unable to make a [738]*738new contract with the National Maritime Union.

“Attached is a copy of the new contract which the Company offered to sign.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grivas v. Alianza Compania Armadora S.A.
150 F. Supp. 708 (S.D. New York, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 F. Supp. 734, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clayton-v-standard-oil-co-txsd-1941.