Clayton v. Social Security Administration
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
JAMES CLAYTON PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 3:19-cv-00075-JTK ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for and Brief in Support of Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Docs. 17 & 18. In his motion, Plaintiff requests $4,669.82 in fees and expenses. Defendant does not object. Doc. 19. After careful consideration, the Court grants the motion and finds that Plaintiff should be awarded reasonable attorney’ s fees. EAJA fees are payable to Plaintiff, not Plaintiff’s attorney, and such fees are subject to an offset when the Plaintiff has outstanding federal debts. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010). Therefore, subject to any offset, payment by check to the order of the Plaintiff, in care of his attorney, will issue to Plaintiff's attorney. Accordingly, the Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. 17) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded $4,669.82. SO ORDERED THIS 11th day of August, 2020.
JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clayton v. Social Security Administration (Clayton v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.