Clayton v. New Dreamland Roller Skating Rink, Inc.
100 A.2d 567, 13 N.J. 527
This text of 100 A.2d 567 (Clayton v. New Dreamland Roller Skating Rink, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clayton v. New Dreamland Roller Skating Rink, Inc., 100 A.2d 567, 13 N.J. 527 (N.J. 1953).
Opinion
ANNIE CLAYTON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS,
v.
NEW DREAMLAND ROLLER SKATING RINK, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Louis Steisel and Mr. Horace G. Davis for the petitioners.
Mr. William J. Egan and Mr. Robert L. Hood for the respondents.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
100 A.2d 567, 13 N.J. 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clayton-v-new-dreamland-roller-skating-rink-inc-nj-1953.