Clayton v. M&T Bank (In re Clayton)

Fourth Circuit

Clayton v. M&T Bank (In re Clayton)

671 F. App'x 80

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 29, 2016·No. No. 16-1714·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

' PER CURIAM:

Wellesley K. Clayton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of a prior order dismissing as untimely his appeal from the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clayton v. M&T Bank, Nos. 3:16-cv-00018-RJC; 15-30573 (W.D.N.C. May 24, 2016). We deny Clayton’s motion for appointment of counsel and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

' PER CURIAM:

Wellesley K. Clayton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of a prior order dismissing as untimely his appeal from the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clayton v. M&T Bank, Nos. 3:16-cv-00018-RJC; 15-30573 (W.D.N.C. May 24, 2016). We deny Clayton’s motion for appointment of counsel and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Clayton v. M&T Bank (In re Clayton), 671 F. App'x 80 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 80 (Clayton v. M&T Bank (In re Clayton)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.