Clayton v. M&T Bank (In re Clayton)
This text of 671 F. App'x 80 (Clayton v. M&T Bank (In re Clayton)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Wellesley K. Clayton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of a prior order dismissing as untimely his appeal from the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clayton v. M&T Bank, Nos. 3:16-cv-00018-RJC; 15-30573 (W.D.N.C. May 24, 2016). We deny Clayton’s motion for appointment of counsel and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 F. App'x 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clayton-v-mt-bank-in-re-clayton-ca4-2016.