Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Clayton v. McDonough

Clayton v. McDonough

955 So. 2d 639, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6629, 2007 WL 1263990
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 2, 2007
DocketNo. 4D06-1750
StatusPublished

This text of 955 So. 2d 639 (Clayton v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clayton v. McDonough, 955 So. 2d 639, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6629, 2007 WL 1263990 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant asserting a claim pursuant to Gomez v. Singletary, 733 So.2d 499 (Fla.1998).

WARNER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gomez v. Singletary
733 So. 2d 499 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
955 So. 2d 639, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6629, 2007 WL 1263990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clayton-v-mcdonough-fladistctapp-2007.