Clayton v. McDonough

955 So. 2d 639, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6629, 2007 WL 1263990
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 2007·No. No. 4D06-1750·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant asserting a claim pursuant to Gomez v. Singletary, 733 So.2d 499 (Fla.1998).

WARNER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clayton v. McDonough, 955 So. 2d 639, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6629, 2007 WL 1263990 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

955 So. 2d 639 (Clayton v. McDonough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gomez v. Singletary
733 So. 2d 499 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)