Clayton v. Kingston
This text of 115 Misc. 631 (Clayton v. Kingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs, who are legatees under the will of the wife of John Kingston, seek to have a lien impressed upon the realty to the extent of their respective legacies, and to have the real estate sold to satisfy them. The realty was devised to the defendant, John Kingston, absolutely, subject to the payment of these legacies. The power of sale provides that the executors, only one of whom, the husband, qualified, are authorized and empowered to sell the real estate at such times and in such manner as they deem most advantageous. Such power of sale is personal, confidential, and discretionary, and was not conferred for the purpose of conversion. There is consequently no trust to sell the property in order to pay the legacies. It was clearly the intent of the testatrix that they should be paid by her husband, who would then hold the realty absolutely free from [632]*632charges; or, if not so paid, then to be paid out of the proceeds from the realty when sold. The charges of waste and mismanagement were not proved. Judgment for defendant, dismissing the complaint upon the merits.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 Misc. 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clayton-v-kingston-nysupct-1921.