Clayton v. Dickens

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1187

ANNA M. CLAYTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JAMES DICKENS; JEMKO TRANSPORT, INCORPORATED,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

C&M FORWARDING COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:08-cv-00592-gec-mfu)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anna M. Clayton, Appellant Pro Se. David Wayne Hearn, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anna M. Clayton appeals the district court’s order

entering judgment for the Defendants on Clayton’s diversity

action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny Clayton’s motion for appointment of

counsel and affirm the judgment of the district court.

Clayton v. Dickens, No. 7:08-cv-00592-gec-mfu (E.D. Va. Jan. 27,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED