Clayton v. Clayton
23 A.2d 560, 127 N.J.L. 605, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 223
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Bodine, Hei-ier, Porter, Colie, Dear, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 9.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Case, Donges, Wells, JJ. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clayton v. Clayton, 23 A.2d 560, 127 N.J.L. 605, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 223 (N.J. 1942).
23 A.2d 560 (Clayton v. Clayton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sipko v. Koger, Inc.
70 A.3d 512 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2013)
Govan v. Trade Bank & Trust Co.
263 A.2d 146 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
Regan v. Lenkowsky
137 F. Supp. 133 (D. New Jersey, 1956)