Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.

172 F. App'x 479
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 F. App'x 301
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2006·No. Nos. 05-2011, 05-2346·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In appeal No. 05-2011, Haywood Clayton and Sylvia K. Clayton appeal from the [480]*480district court’s order denying their motions for a stay, for change of venue, and to vacate orders of the district court. In appeal No. 05-2346, Haywood Clayton appeals from the district court’s orders granting Ameriquest’s motions for an order to show cause and for a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co., 388 F.Supp.2d 601 (M.D.N.C.2005 & Oct. 26, 2005). We deny Ameriquest’s motion for sanctions and motion to dismiss appeal No. 05-2011. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co., 172 F. App'x 479 (4th Cir. 2006).

172 F. App'x 479 (Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.
388 F. Supp. 2d 601 (M.D. North Carolina, 2005)