Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.

172 F. App'x 479
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 2006
DocketNos. 05-2011, 05-2346
StatusPublished

This text of 172 F. App'x 479 (Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co., 172 F. App'x 479 (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In appeal No. 05-2011, Haywood Clayton and Sylvia K. Clayton appeal from the [480]*480district court’s order denying their motions for a stay, for change of venue, and to vacate orders of the district court. In appeal No. 05-2346, Haywood Clayton appeals from the district court’s orders granting Ameriquest’s motions for an order to show cause and for a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co., 388 F.Supp.2d 601 (M.D.N.C.2005 & Oct. 26, 2005). We deny Ameriquest’s motion for sanctions and motion to dismiss appeal No. 05-2011. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.
388 F. Supp. 2d 601 (M.D. North Carolina, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 F. App'x 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clayton-v-ameriquest-mortgage-co-ca4-2006.