Clayton County Board of Tax Assessors v. King

397 S.E.2d 293, 260 Ga. 495, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 407
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 31, 1990·No. S90A1161·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Fletcher, Justice.

This case involves a dispute over whether the law library of an attorney is subject to ad valorem taxation. Appellant contends that a law library is subject to ad valorem taxation and that the Superior Court of Clayton County erred when it granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment on such issue while denying that of appellant. We agree and reverse.

OCGA § 48-5-3 provides that all personal property shall be taxed except as otherwise provided by law. OCGA § 48-5-40 et seq. sets forth personal property exemptions that exist pursuant to Georgia law, while Art. VII, Sec. II, Par. I of the Georgia Constitution provides that only those tax exemptions which are authorized in or are pursuant to such constitution are valid.

An attorney’s law library, which is maintained in connection with the practice of his or her profession, is not exempted from ad valorem taxation by Georgia’s Constitution, nor is it exempted by any legislation enacted pursuant to such constitution. We hold that both the grant of appellee’s motion for summary judgment and the denial of appellant’s motion for summary judgment were error.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clayton County Board of Tax Assessors v. King, 397 S.E.2d 293, 260 Ga. 495, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 407 (Ga. 1990).

397 S.E.2d 293 (Clayton County Board of Tax Assessors v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gainesville Asphalt, Inc. v. Hall County
448 S.E.2d 721 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)