Clayton Clemons v. Greenville Chapter of the American Red Cross

928 F.2d 399, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8662, 1991 WL 35733
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 20, 1991
Docket90-1149
StatusUnpublished

This text of 928 F.2d 399 (Clayton Clemons v. Greenville Chapter of the American Red Cross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clayton Clemons v. Greenville Chapter of the American Red Cross, 928 F.2d 399, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8662, 1991 WL 35733 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

928 F.2d 399
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Clayton CLEMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GREENVILLE CHAPTER OF the AMERICAN RED CROSS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-1149.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 4, 1991.
Decided March 20, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Joe F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-90-1336-6-17K)

Clayton Clemons, appellant pro se.

Thomas Louis Stephenson, Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, Greenville, S.C., for appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Clayton Clemons appeals from the district court's order dismissing, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332(a), his breach of contract action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clemons v. Greenville Red Cross, CA-90-1336-6-17K (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
928 F.2d 399, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8662, 1991 WL 35733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clayton-clemons-v-greenville-chapter-of-the-american-red-cross-ca4-1991.