Claypool v. State

322 S.W.3d 639, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1370, 2010 WL 3971321
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 12, 2010·No. ED 94208·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Edward Claypool (Claypool) appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 amended motion for post-conviction relief. In his amended motion, Claypool alleged the voluntary nature of his plea was compromised because his plea counsel failed to inform him that the State had insufficient evidence to obtain a conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm because the alleged victim was deceased. The motion court denied Claypool’s amended motion, finding that Claypool failed to allege facts that were not refuted by the record which, if true, would entitle him to relief. Finding no clear error in the motion court’s ruling, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claypool v. State, 322 S.W.3d 639, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1370, 2010 WL 3971321 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

322 S.W.3d 639 (Claypool v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phillips v. Division of Employment Security
322 S.W.3d 639 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)