Claymont v. Levitt

140 A.D.2d 578, 528 N.Y.S.2d 644, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5636
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 23, 1988·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff placed a restraining notice on the proceeds of artwork and other articles consigned for sale by the wife of the defendant judgment debtor. The defendant’s wife, in an affidavit, swore that these items were her property obtained prior to her marriage to the judgment debtor. The sole evidence submitted by the plaintiff to support his contention that the consigned property belonged to the defendant was a [579]*579vague, nonspecific statement in his affidavit that the descriptions of "many” of the articles consigned for sale matched articles he had seen at the defendant’s house before the defendant married. This claim did not satisfy the plaintiff’s obligation to produce evidence from which the hearing court could infer that the property sold by the defendant’s wife actually belonged to the defendant (see, Matter of New York Credit Men’s Assn. v Schneider, 247 App Div 896, appeal dismissed 273 NY 625, mot to vacate order of dismissal denied 274 NY 637). Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claymont v. Levitt, 140 A.D.2d 578, 528 N.Y.S.2d 644, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5636 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

140 A.D.2d 578 (Claymont v. Levitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saadeh v. Kagan
S.D. New York, 2025
Perkins v. Perkins
226 A.D.2d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Koffman
849 F. Supp. 176 (N.D. New York, 1994)