Claydon v. Cheesborough

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claydon v. Cheesborough

240 A.D. 972

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 972 (Claydon v. Cheesborough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claydon v. Cheesborough, 240 A.D. 972 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the City Court of Mount Vernon unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Findings of fact seventh and eighth are reversed, and in lieu thereof a new finding is made by this court as follows: That previous to the 1st day of October, 1930, the parties entered into a new agreement for the lease of the premises occupied by the defendant whereby it was agreed that the monthly rental thereafter should be $175 per month, of which amount the defendant was to pay presently each month the sum of $150, and hat he did pay such sums in accordance with the contract, and that the remaining [973]*973$25 was to be paid in the future within a reasonable time; and that that time has now elapsed and there is due from the defendant to the plaintiff the sum of $300. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the City Court of Mount Vernon unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Findings of fact seventh and eighth are reversed, and in lieu thereof a new finding is made by this court as follows: That previous to the 1st day of October, 1930, the parties entered into a new agreement for the lease of the premises occupied by the defendant whereby it was agreed that the monthly rental thereafter should be $175 per month, of which amount the defendant was to pay presently each month the sum of $150, and hat he did pay such sums in accordance with the contract, and that the remaining [973]*973$25 was to be paid in the future within a reasonable time; and that that time has now elapsed and there is due from the defendant to the plaintiff the sum of $300. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claydon-v-cheesborough-nyappdiv-1933.