Claybrooks v. Pugh

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Claybrooks v. Pugh. Read the opinion of the Court — 289 F. App'x 605
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2008·No. 08-6548·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6548

WILLIAM J. CLAYBROOKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROSALYN E. PUGH, Clerk of the Circuit Court,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:08- cv-00624-PJM)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 26, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William J. Claybrooks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William J. Claybrooks, a Maryland prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order dismissing as legally frivolous Claybrooks’

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Claybrooks v. Pugh, No. 8:08-cv-

00624-PJM (D. Md., Mar. 18, 2008). Further, we deny Claybrooks’

motions for the appointment of counsel and for transcripts at

Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claybrooks v. Pugh, (4th Cir. 2008).

Claybrooks v. Pugh (Claybrooks v. Pugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related