Claybourne v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claybourne v. City of New York

128 A.D.2d 667, 513 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44357

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 1987·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hyman, J.), dated August 29, 1985, which denied their motion to compel examinations before trial of the municipal defendants and imposed a sanction of $100.

Ordered that the order is modified, by deleting the provision thereof which imposed a sanction of $100. As so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondents.

The plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 for court-ordered depositions was properly denied because no showing was made of a previous demand for pretrial examinations (see, Wiseman v American Motors Sales Corp., 103 AD2d 230). The sanction, however, cannot be imposed because there is neither [668] a statute nor a court rule authorizing its imposition (see, Matter of A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v Lezak, 69 NY2d 1). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hyman, J.), dated August 29, 1985, which denied their motion to compel examinations before trial of the municipal defendants and imposed a sanction of $100.

Ordered that the order is modified, by deleting the provision thereof which imposed a sanction of $100. As so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondents.

The plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 for court-ordered depositions was properly denied because no showing was made of a previous demand for pretrial examinations (see, Wiseman v American Motors Sales Corp., 103 AD2d 230). The sanction, however, cannot be imposed because there is neither [668] a statute nor a court rule authorizing its imposition (see, Matter of A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v Lezak, 69 NY2d 1). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Claybourne v. City of New York, 128 A.D.2d 667, 513 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44357 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

128 A.D.2d 667 (Claybourne v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related