Clayborne v. Lancanster County
667 F. App'x 878
Opinion
Robert Clayborne, Jr. appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) dismissal of his pro se complaint asserting a claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and a claim of disability discrimination, under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Upon careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we conclude that the dismissal was proper. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clayborne v. Lancanster County, 667 F. App'x 878 (8th Cir. 2016).
667 F. App'x 878 (Clayborne v. Lancanster County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)
Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 U.S.C. § 1983