Clayborne v. Lancanster County

Eighth Circuit

Clayborne v. Lancanster County

667 F. App'x 878

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedAugust 3, 2016

DocketNo. 16-1615

StatusPublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 878 (Clayborne v. Lancanster County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clayborne v. Lancanster County, 667 F. App'x 878 (8th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Clayborne, Jr. appeals the district court’s¹ 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) dismissal of his pro se complaint asserting a claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and a claim of disability discrimination, under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Upon careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we conclude that the dismissal was proper. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert Clayborne, Jr. appeals the district court’s¹ 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) dismissal of his pro se complaint asserting a claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and a claim of disability discrimination, under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Upon careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we conclude that the dismissal was proper. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 F. App'x 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clayborne-v-lancanster-county-ca8-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack