Clay Vance Conner v. Unidentified Judge, of the Supreme Court of Virginia
Opinion
829 F.2d 35
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Clay Vance CONNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNIDENTIFIED JUDGE, of the Supreme Court of Virginia,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-6558
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 14, 1987.
Decided September 3, 1987.
Clay Vance Conner, appellant pro se.
Robert Quentin Harris, Assistant Attorney General for appellee.
Before K.K. HALL, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Conner v. Unidentified Judge, C/A No. 86-618-R (W.D. Va., Jan. 30, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
829 F.2d 35 (Clay Vance Conner v. Unidentified Judge, of the Supreme Court of Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.