Clay Vance Conner v. Kerry Donnelly, M.D.
This text of 72 F.3d 126 (Clay Vance Conner v. Kerry Donnelly, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
72 F.3d 126
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Clay Vance CONNER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Kerry DONNELLY, M.D., Defendant--Appellee.
No. 95-7379.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 30, 1995.
Decided Dec. 15, 1995.
Clay Vance Conner, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-15)
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Conner v. Donnelly, No. CA-93-15 (W.D.Va. Aug. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 F.3d 126, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39537, 1995 WL 747258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clay-vance-conner-v-kerry-donnelly-md-ca4-1995.