Clay Vance Conner v. David L. Smith Danny Crigger Patty L. Huffman Joe Hubbard Richard Young Valerie D. Rasheed Edward C. Morris

Fourth Circuit

Clay Vance Conner v. David L. Smith Danny Crigger Patty L. Huffman Joe Hubbard Richard Young Valerie D. Rasheed Edward C. Morris

60 F.3d 821, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24769

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 14, 1995

Docket19-1562

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 821 (Clay Vance Conner v. David L. Smith Danny Crigger Patty L. Huffman Joe Hubbard Richard Young Valerie D. Rasheed Edward C. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clay Vance Conner v. David L. Smith Danny Crigger Patty L. Huffman Joe Hubbard Richard Young Valerie D. Rasheed Edward C. Morris, 60 F.3d 821, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24769 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 821
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Clay Vance CONNER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
David L. SMITH; Danny Crigger; Patty L. Huffman; Joe
Hubbard; Richard Young; Valerie D. Rasheed;
Edward C. Morris, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6618.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 14, 1995.

Clay Vance Conner, appellant pro se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Conner v. Smith, No. CA-94-679-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 821
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Clay Vance CONNER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
David L. SMITH; Danny Crigger; Patty L. Huffman; Joe
Hubbard; Richard Young; Valerie D. Rasheed;
Edward C. Morris, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6618.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 14, 1995.

Clay Vance Conner, appellant pro se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Conner v. Smith, No. CA-94-679-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 821, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clay-vance-conner-v-david-l-smith-danny-crigger-pa-ca4-1995.