Clay v. Stophel

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6721

MAURICE OAKLEY CLAY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ANN STOPHEL, sued in her individual capacity; DOCTOR WRAY, sued in his individual capacity; J. L. GOWAN, M.D., sued in his individual and official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

MIKE SALYER, sued in his individual capacity; DOCTOR OHAI, sued in his individual capacity,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:04-cv-00590-WDK)

Submitted: November 3, 2006 Decided: November 21, 2006

Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Oakley Clay, Appellant Pro Se. Henry Smith Keuling-Stout, KEULING-STOUT, PC, Big Stone Gap, Virginia; Samuel Lawrence Dumville, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Coreen Antoinette Bromfield, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Maurice Oakley Clay appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clay v.

Stophel, No. 2:04-cv-00590-WDK (E.D. Va. Mar. 22, 2006). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -