Clay v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Clay v. State

724 S.W.2d 58, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 508

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 4, 1987

DocketNo. 272-86

StatusPublished

This text of 724 S.W.2d 58 (Clay v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clay v. State, 724 S.W.2d 58, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 508 (Tex. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

WHITE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery. Punishment was assessed by the trial court at 15 years in the Texas Department of Corrections. On appeal the San Antonio Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Clay v. State, 702 S.W.2d 747 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1985).

Appellant raises three grounds for review. We agree with the Court of Appeals that none require reversal. However, as is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI