Clay v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Clay v. State

1935 OK CR 88, 47 P.2d 1119, 57 Okla. Crim. 257, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 62

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 12, 1935

DocketNo. A-8779.

StatusPublished

This text of 1935 OK CR 88 (Clay v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clay v. State, 1935 OK CR 88, 47 P.2d 1119, 57 Okla. Crim. 257, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 62 (Okla. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted of transporting intoxicating liquor, and each was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to serve sixty days in the county jail.

The record was filed in this court August 1, 1934; no brief in support of the appeal has been filed.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted of transporting intoxicating liquor, and each was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to serve sixty days in the county jail.

The record was filed in this court August 1, 1934; no brief in support of the appeal has been filed.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1935 OK CR 88, 47 P.2d 1119, 57 Okla. Crim. 257, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clay-v-state-oklacrimapp-1935.