Clay v. State
772 S.W.2d 781, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 585, 1989 WL 44222
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clay v. State, 772 S.W.2d 781, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 585, 1989 WL 44222 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).
772 S.W.2d 781 (Clay v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.