Clay v. State
This text of 291 S.E.2d 432 (Clay v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Clay appealed her conviction of voluntary manslaughter on the general grounds and other enumerated errors. On October 8, 1981 [347]*347this court reversed Clay’s conviction because there was no evidence that the killing of Clay’s husband occurred solely as a result of a sudden, violent and irresistible passion resulting from serious provocation, which is an essential element of the offense of voluntary manslaughter as defined in Code § 26-1102. Clay v. State, 160 Ga. App. 178 (286 SE2d 476). On April 7, 1982 the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the opinion of this court, holding that since the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction of murder, Clay cannot contest her conviction of voluntary manslaughter on the general grounds because she affirmatively offered the alternative theory of voluntary manslaughter to the jury. State v. Clay, 249 Ga. 250 (290 SE2d 84) (1982). The Supreme Court found no merit in Clay’s remaining enumerations of error. Accordingly, the judgment of this court dated October 8, 1981 is vacated and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
291 S.E.2d 432, 162 Ga. App. 346, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clay-v-state-gactapp-1982.