Clay v. State
22 S.E.2d 325, 68 Ga. App. 206, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 89
Opinion
The accused was convicted, in the criminal court of Fulton County, of the offense of cheating and swindling. The evidence, while in sharp conflict, authorized the verdict. The assignment of error, in the petition for certiorari, on the refusal of the court to give *207 a certain requested charge to the jury, can not be considered by this court, since the trial judge in his untráversed answer to the petition certifies that there was no written request for the charge. The overruling of the certiorari was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clay v. State, 22 S.E.2d 325, 68 Ga. App. 206, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 89 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).
22 S.E.2d 325 (Clay v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.