Clay v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Clay v. State

508 So. 2d 561, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1516, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8931

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 17, 1987

DocketNo. 85-2931

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 508 So. 2d 561 (Clay v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clay v. State, 508 So. 2d 561, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1516, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8931 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the revocation of his probation and sentence therefor.

We affirm the revocation of probation. We find no reversible error from his contention that adequate charging documents do not appear in the record. The [562]*562record reflects that he was charged with certain probation violations of which he was found guilty, and there was no objection to any failure to advise him of the charges.

However, there must be a remand for resentencing. While the trial court orally departed from the sentencing guidelines, no written reasons were provided, and the oral reasons were clearly insufficient under the case law.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing within the guidelines recommended sentencing range.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI