Clay v. State

571 So. 2d 408, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1665, 1990 WL 212403
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clay v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 561 So. 2d 1116
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided October 26, 1990·No. 8 Div. 327·Published

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

TYSON, Judge.

Due return to the opinion of the Alabama Supreme Court, Ex parte Clay, 562 So.2d 1307 (Ala.1990), and of this court in Clay v. State, 562 So.2d 1310 (Ala.Crim.App.1990), having been duly filed by the Circuit Court of Madison County, this opinion is hereby issued dismissing this appeal.

In the return filed in this court, a stipulation was entered in circuit court showing that, in fact, a plea bargain agreement had been entered into by and between the appellant, Mary Louise Clay, and the State, through the district attorney’s office. This was with reference to a plea of guilty.

The circuit court has now set aside the guilty plea and restored the cause to the trial docket for trial.

No further issue remains and this appeal is therefore dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clay v. State, 571 So. 2d 408, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1665, 1990 WL 212403 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

571 So. 2d 408 (Clay v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Clay
562 So. 2d 1307 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1990)
Clay v. State
562 So. 2d 1310 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)