Clay v. Smith
This text of Clay v. Smith (Clay v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FILED JAN 2 9 2Ul0 Kenneth Clay, ) Clerk, U.S. District and ) 8ankruptcy Courts Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) Hugh Smith, ) ) 10 (J172 Respondent. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has submitted an application for a writ of habeas corpus
along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to
proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.
Petitioner is a Georgia state prisoner at the Dodge State Prison challenging a conviction
entered by the Superior Court of Muscogee County. Pet. at 2. Federal court review of state
convictions is available under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 only after the exhaustion of available state
remedies. See 28 U.S.c. §2254(b)(1). Thereafter, "an application for a writ of habeas corpus []
made by a person in custody under the judgment and sentence of a State court ... may be filed in
the district court for the district wherein such person is in custody or in the district court for the
district within which the State court was held which convicted and sentenced [petitioner] and
each of such district courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction to entertain the application." 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (d). Petitioner has no recourse here. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies
this Memorandum Opinion.
~ Date: January /.3,2010
IV
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clay v. Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clay-v-smith-dcd-2010.