Clay v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

576 So. 2d 1360, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2928, 1991 WL 44973
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1991·No. No. 90-1182·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only error which we perceive herein is the trial court’s limitation of the period for which the insurer should pay the beneficiary’s attorney’s fee, and we conclude the correct period to be June 19, 1986 until December 28, 1989. See Ray v. Travelers Ins. Co., 477 So.2d 634 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand with direction to award such fee for the above period, using the same hourly rate and without the application of a contingency fee multiplier.

GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H„ Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clay v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 576 So. 2d 1360, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2928, 1991 WL 44973 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

576 So. 2d 1360 (Clay v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clay v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
617 So. 2d 433 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)