Clay v. Merchants Mutual Credit Corp.

72 S.E.2d 833, 86 Ga. App. 832, 1952 Ga. App. LEXIS 1076
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 26, 1952·No. 34168·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Worrill, J.

1. Where the defendant excepted to a judgment overruling his general demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition but failed to argue or insist upon that ground of exception before this court, the judgment of the trial court overruling such general demurrers will be affirmed. See Code (Ann.), § 6-1308, and cases cited under catchword “Abandonment.”

2. “An assignment of error on a judgment striking an answer can not be made in a bill of exceptions assigning error on a judgment overruling a general demurrer to a petition. Wright v. Morris, 50 Ga. App. 196 (3) (77 S. E. 365).” Cooledge v. Casey, 58 Ga. App. 134 (2), 137 (198 S. E. 96).

Judgment affirmed.

Sutton, C.J., and Felton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clay v. Merchants Mutual Credit Corp., 72 S.E.2d 833, 86 Ga. App. 832, 1952 Ga. App. LEXIS 1076 (Ga. Ct. App. 1952).

72 S.E.2d 833 (Clay v. Merchants Mutual Credit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pate v. Brock
98 S.E.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Gay v. Greene
84 S.E.2d 847 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)