Clay v. Manis

Fourth Circuit

Clay v. Manis

670 F. App'x 87

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 24, 2016·No. No. 16-6315·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlton Clay appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C, § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clay v. Manis, No. 2:16-cv-00036-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlton Clay appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C, § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clay v. Manis, No. 2:16-cv-00036-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Clay v. Manis, 670 F. App'x 87 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 87 (Clay v. Manis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related