Clay v. Kane

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 20, 2012
Docket07-55377
StatusUnpublished

This text of Clay v. Kane (Clay v. Kane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clay v. Kane, (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 20 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELIJAH CLAY, No. 07-55377

Petitioner - Appellee, D.C. No. CV-04-08663-VAP Central District of California, v. Los Angeles

A. P. KANE, ORDER Respondent - Appellant.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Before: PREGERSON and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and LEIGHTON, District Judge.*

In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Swarthout v. Cooke, 131 S.Ct.

859 (2011), this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings

consistent with that opinion.

* The Honorable Ronald B. Leighton, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swarthout v. Cooke
178 L. Ed. 2d 732 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Clay v. Kane, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clay-v-kane-ca9-2012.