Clay v. Internal Revenue Service
This text of 399 F. App'x 788 (Clay v. Internal Revenue Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Percy Lee Clay and Diane Clay appeal the district court’s orders dismissing, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, their action challenging their federal income tax liability, as well as their motions for reconsideration and recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clay v. Internal Rev. Serv., No. 1:08-cv-00681-WO-PTS, 2009 WL 3391577 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 2009); 2010 WL 4489368 (Mar. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
399 F. App'x 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clay-v-internal-revenue-service-ca4-2010.