Clay v. Fox

8 Ky. 557, 1 A.K. Marsh. 557, 1819 Ky. LEXIS 77
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJune 7, 1819
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Ky. 557 (Clay v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clay v. Fox, 8 Ky. 557, 1 A.K. Marsh. 557, 1819 Ky. LEXIS 77 (Ky. Ct. App. 1819).

Opinion

Judge Owsley

delivered the opinion of the court.

Upon the principle recognized by this court in the case of Kendal and al. against Slaughter, decided at the fall term 1818, it follows, that no provision, either of the compact with the state of Virginia, or the constitution of this slate, or that of’the United St.ates, is contravened by the passage of the act of 1808, concerning the limitations of actions in relation to land claims derived from the laws of Virginia.

The.plea of Fox, therefore, as it contains ail material averments necessary to bring his case -within the provisions of that act, was properly sustained, and upon overruling Clay’s demurrer to the plea, the court correctly rendered judgment in bar of his action.

•The judgment must be affirmed with cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Ky. 557, 1 A.K. Marsh. 557, 1819 Ky. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clay-v-fox-kyctapp-1819.