Clay v. Clay
421 N.W.2d 797, 228 Neb. 264, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 142
Opinion
The respondent, Tera Lynn Clay, appeals from the order of the district court placing the care, custody, control, and possession of the children of the parties, Patrick James Clay, Jr., and Jill Marie Clay, in and with the petitioner, Patrick James Clay. We have, as required in cases of this nature, reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion. Grindle v. Grindle, 226 Neb. 807, 415 N.W.2d 150 (1987).
We find no such abuse; accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clay v. Clay, 421 N.W.2d 797, 228 Neb. 264, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 142 (Neb. 1988).
421 N.W.2d 797 (Clay v. Clay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grindle v. Grindle
415 N.W.2d 150 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)