Clay v. Clay

Nebraska Supreme Court

Clay v. Clay

421 N.W.2d 797, 228 Neb. 264, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 142

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1988

DocketNo. 87-560

StatusPublished

This text of 421 N.W.2d 797 (Clay v. Clay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clay v. Clay, 421 N.W.2d 797, 228 Neb. 264, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 142 (Neb. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent, Tera Lynn Clay, appeals from the order of the district court placing the care, custody, control, and possession of the children of the parties, Patrick James Clay, Jr., and Jill Marie Clay, in and with the petitioner, Patrick James Clay. We have, as required in cases of this nature, reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion. Grindle v. Grindle, 226 Neb. 807, 415 N.W.2d 150 (1987).

We find no such abuse; accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The respondent, Tera Lynn Clay, appeals from the order of the district court placing the care, custody, control, and possession of the children of the parties, Patrick James Clay, Jr., and Jill Marie Clay, in and with the petitioner, Patrick James Clay. We have, as required in cases of this nature, reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion. Grindle v. Grindle, 226 Neb. 807, 415 N.W.2d 150 (1987).

We find no such abuse; accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

421 N.W.2d 797, 228 Neb. 264, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clay-v-clay-neb-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack