Clay v. Clay

California Court of Appeal

Clay v. Clay

65 P.2d 1363, 19 Cal. App. 2d 589, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 482

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 17, 1937

DocketCiv. No. 11341

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 65 P.2d 1363 (Clay v. Clay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clay v. Clay, 65 P.2d 1363, 19 Cal. App. 2d 589, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 482 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

CRAIL, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant.

It is a sufficient compliance with the constitutional provision, which requires us to state the reasons for our decisions in writing, to say in this ease that the appellant and respondent have stipulated that the decision herein be rendered.

The stipulation also provides that this court direct the trial court to enter judgment for the defendant. But this we refuse to do. This is a divorce case and the trial court may well exercise its authority in the premises after trial or after hearing on a motion.

[590]*590The judgment is reversed. Each party is to pay his or her own costs on appeal. Let remittitur issue forthwith.

Wood, J., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI