Clay v. Barkley

2 Ky. 67, 1 Sneed 67, 1801 Ky. LEXIS 59
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided August 13, 1801·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The words charged in the declaration in this suit, “ He killed and salted one of my hogs,” do not necessarily mean nor imply that the hog was feloniously stolen, and without such a meaning or implication, they are not actionable, when no special damage arising from the speaking of them is averred. Therefore, it is considered by the court, that the judgment aforesaid be reversed and set aside, and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant his costs in this behalf expended; which is ordered to be certified to the said court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clay v. Barkley, 2 Ky. 67, 1 Sneed 67, 1801 Ky. LEXIS 59 (Ky. Ct. App. 1801).

2 Ky. 67 (Clay v. Barkley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pope v. State
149 Tenn. 176 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1923)
State v. Witherspoon
115 Tenn. 138 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1905)
United States v. Hirschfield
26 F. Cas. 328 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1876)
Daniel v. State
50 Tenn. 257 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1871)