Clay Township v. Head

61 N.E. 564, 157 Ind. 240, 1901 Ind. LEXIS 153
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided October 8, 1901·No. No. 19,449·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have before us what purports to be a transcript of the record of certain proceedings in said cause. It is not accompanied with, a certificate over the signature of the clerk and seal of the court that the same is true. We have no power to consider a record as presenting questions for decision unless it comes to us authenticated as required by §661 Burns 1894, §649 R. S. 1881 and Horner 1897. Watson v. Finch, 150 Ind. 183; Fidelity, etc., Union v. Byrd, 154 Ind. 47; Carpenter v. Schaeffer, 154 Ind. 694; Board, etc., v. State, ex rel., 156 Ind. 550.

The appeal must, therefore, be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clay Township v. Head, 61 N.E. 564, 157 Ind. 240, 1901 Ind. LEXIS 153 (Ind. 1901).

61 N.E. 564 (Clay Township v. Head) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buehl v. American Indemnity Co.
1919 OK 19 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1919)