Clay Township v. Head
This text of 61 N.E. 564 (Clay Township v. Head) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have before us what purports to be a transcript of the record of certain proceedings in said cause. It is not accompanied with, a certificate over the signature of the clerk and seal of the court that the same is true. We have no power to consider a record as presenting questions for decision unless it comes to us authenticated as required by §661 Burns 1894, §649 R. S. 1881 and Horner 1897. Watson v. Finch, 150 Ind. 183; Fidelity, etc., Union v. Byrd, 154 Ind. 47; Carpenter v. Schaeffer, 154 Ind. 694; Board, etc., v. State, ex rel., 156 Ind. 550.
The appeal must, therefore, be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 N.E. 564, 157 Ind. 240, 1901 Ind. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clay-township-v-head-ind-1901.