Clay Mullins v. Speed Mining, LLC

CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 6, 2019
Docket19-0059
StatusPublished

This text of Clay Mullins v. Speed Mining, LLC (Clay Mullins v. Speed Mining, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clay Mullins v. Speed Mining, LLC, (W. Va. 2019).

Opinion

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

CLAY MULLINS, FILED Claimant Below, Petitioner December 6, 2019 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS vs.) No. 19-0059 (BOR Appeal No. 2053092) OF WEST VIRGINIA

(Claim No. 2012012735)

SPEED MINING, LLC, Employer Below, Respondent

MEMORANDUM DECISION Petitioner Clay Mullins, by Counsel Reginald D. Henry, appeals the decision of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review (“Board of Review”). Speed Mining, LLC, by Counsel Henry C. Bowen, filed a timely response.

The issue on appeal is permanent total disability. The claims administrator denied the application for a permanent total disability award on September 21, 2017. The Office of Judges affirmed the decision in its July 5, 2018, Order. The Order was affirmed by the Board of Review on December 26, 2018.

The Court has carefully reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is mature for consideration. The facts and legal arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Mr. Mullins, a coal miner, suffered several injuries over the course of his more than thirty years of employment. In 1977, he injured his lumbar spine. In 1978, he sustained an injury to his lumbar spine and left heel. In 1979, he injured his right knee and ankle. The right knee required two surgeries and Mr. Mullins was granted a 15% permanent partial disability award. In 1981, Mr. Mullins injured his right knee and ankle. He suffered a crush injury to the left hand in 1982, underwent two surgeries, and was granted a 3% permanent partial disability award. Mr. Mullins sustained a lumbar spine injury in 1983, underwent surgery, and was assessed with 10% impairment by A.E. Landis, M.D. In 1985, Mr. Mullins injured his lumbar spine and was assessed with 3% additional lumbar impairment by Dr. Landis. Mr. Mullins then underwent lumbar spine 1 surgery and was subsequently granted a total award of 14% permanent partial disability for the lumbar spine. In 1992, Mr. Mullins received a 10% permanent partial disability award for occupational pneumoconiosis. In 2000, Mr. Mullins suffered two work injures, one to his left ankle and the other to his right hand and tendon. The right hand injury required two surgeries and he was eventually granted a 12% permanent partial disability award.

On July 7, 2006, Joseph Grady, M.D., performed an independent medical evaluation in which he found that Mr. Mullins had 1% left shoulder impairment and no additional right knee impairment. Robert Walker, M.D., performed an independent medical evaluation on December 4, 2011, in which he assessed 8% cervical spine impairment, 5% thoracic spine impairment, 7% left shoulder impairment, and 4% right knee impairment. His combined assessment was 22% whole person impairment. Mr. Mullins was then evaluated by H. R. Fleschner, M.D., on February 14, 2012. Dr. Fleschner assessed 8% cervical spine impairment, 5% thoracic spine impairment, 6% left shoulder impairment, and 4% right knee impairment for a total impairment rating of 21%.

On April 3, 2013, the Office of Judges reversed an August 9, 2011, claims administrator’s decision granting a 1% permanent partial disability award and instead granted an 8% permanent partial disability award for the cervical spine and a 1% award for the left shoulder. Mr. Mullins was granted a 0.18% permanent partial disability award for hearing loss on June 20, 2012.

On November 13, 2013, Prasadarao Mukkamala, M.D., performed an independent medical evaluation to determine if Mr. Mullins met the 50% threshold to proceed with an application for permanent total disability benefits. Dr. Mukkamala opined that he had 8% cervical spine impairment. For the lumbar spine, Dr. Mukkamala assessed 12% impairment under Table 75 of the American Medical Association’s Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (4th ed. 1993) and 4% for range of motion loss for a total of 16% whole person impairment. He then placed Mr. Mullins in Lumbar Category III of West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20-C (2006) and adjusted the rating to 13%. Dr. Mukkamala assessed no impairment for the thoracic spine, right knee, right ankle, or left shoulder. Dr. Mukkamala made note that Mr. Mullins was previously awarded 10% impairment for occupational pneumoconiosis and 0.18% for hearing loss. His combined total impairment assessment was 27.18%. Dr. Mukkamala opined that Mr. Mullins was not permanently and totally disabled and that he could work at the medium physical demand level.

The Permanent Total Disability Review Board’s Initial Recommendations for Mr. Mullins’s first application for permanent total disability were released on April 14, 2014. The Board determined that Mr. Mullins was not permanently and totally disabled. It found that he had 19% spine impairment; 10% impairment for occupational pneumoconiosis; and 0% impairment for hearing loss, the right knee, and the left shoulder. The claims administrator denied Mr. Mullins’s first application for a permanent total disability award on July 24, 2014.

Bruce Guberman, M.D., performed an independent medical evaluation on October 17, 2014, to determine if Mr. Mullins met the 50% threshold to proceed with an application for permanent total disability. For the lumbar spine, Dr. Guberman assessed 10% impairment under Category II-E from Table 75 of the American Medical Association’s Guides. Dr. Guberman assessed an additional 2% for lumbar surgery and 9% for loss of range of motion. His total 2 recommendation for the lumbar spine was 20% impairment. Dr. Guberman then placed Mr. Mullins in Lumbar Category III from West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20-C and adjusted the rating to 13%. For the cervical spine, Dr. Guberman determined that Mr. Mullins had 4% impairment from Table 75 of the American Medical Association’s Guides and 9% impairment for reduced range of motion. Dr. Guberman placed Mr. Mullins in Cervical Category II of West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20-E (2006) and adjusted the rating to 8%. For the thoracic spine, Dr. Guberman assessed 2% impairment from Table 75 of the American Medical Association’s Guides and 4% for range of motion restriction. He then placed Mr. Mullins in Thoracic Category II from West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20-D (2006). His total thoracic impairment assessment was 6%. Dr. Guberman further found 8% right knee impairment, 4% left ankle impairment, 7% impairment for combined injuries to the right hand and wrist, and 7% left shoulder impairment. His combined total whole person impairment assessment was 56%.

The Office of Judges affirmed the July 24, 2014, claims administrator’s decision denying the application for permanent total disability on January 30, 2015. It found that Mr. Mullins had a total of 46.18% impairment. It adopted Dr. Guberman’s assessments of 20% lumbar spine impairment, 13% cervical spine impairment, 8% right knee impairment, and 7% right hand impairment. The Office of Judges adopted Dr. Mukkamala’s assessments of 0% thoracic spine impairment and 0% left shoulder impairment. The Board of Review affirmed the decision. On August 1, 2016, this Court affirmed the Board of Review’s decision. We stated that the Office of Judges erred in recalculating Mr. Mullins’s total disability using pieces of different evaluations. The Office of Judges also improperly calculated the whole person impairment and failed to address the Permanent Total Disability Review Board’s findings. However, the errors were not deemed to be reversible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 23-4-6
West Virginia § 23-4-6(n)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Clay Mullins v. Speed Mining, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clay-mullins-v-speed-mining-llc-wva-2019.