Claxton v. James

70 S.E. 1124, 9 Ga. App. 259, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 501
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 24, 1911
Docket2983
StatusPublished

This text of 70 S.E. 1124 (Claxton v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claxton v. James, 70 S.E. 1124, 9 Ga. App. 259, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 501 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Poweix, J.

If the mule levied upon in this case was the mule included in the plaintiff’s mortgage, the judgment should have been in favor, of the plaintiff; on the other hand, if it was not the same mule, the judgment for the claimant should stand. The case, therefore, turns solely upon a question of identity, which is essentially a question of fact; and, there being evidence pro and con, this- court has no jurisdiction to overrule the finding of the trial court on this issue, although the evidence does seem strongly to preponderate against the finding.

Judgment affirmed.

William Faircloih,' Charles S. Claxion, for plaintiff. F. L. Stephens, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 S.E. 1124, 9 Ga. App. 259, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claxton-v-james-gactapp-1911.