Claxton v. Adams

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Claxton v. Adams

8 D.C. 496

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided April 15, 1874·No. No. 10117·Published

Opinion

Cartter, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The objection to the admissibility of a deposition as evidence in a cause should be made by motion to suppress before going into trial. The objections in this case, therefore, came too late, even if they would have been good on a motion to suppress; but if called upon to pass upon the sufficiency of the objections, the court is inclined to the opinion that the same are not well taken. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cartter, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The objection to the admissibility of a deposition as evidence in a cause should be made by motion to suppress before going into trial. The objections in this case, therefore, came too late, even if they would have been good on a motion to suppress; but if called upon to pass upon the sufficiency of the objections, the court is inclined to the opinion that the same are not well taken. Judgment affirmed.

Claxton v. Adams, 8 D.C. 496 (D.C. 1874).

Pincite

8 D.C. 496 (Claxton v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.