Claxton v. Adams

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Claxton v. Adams

8 D.C. 496

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 15, 1874

DocketNo. 10117

StatusPublished

This text of 8 D.C. 496 (Claxton v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claxton v. Adams, 8 D.C. 496 (D.C. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Cartter, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The objection to the admissibility of a deposition as evidence in a cause should be made by motion to suppress before going into trial. The objections in this case, therefore, came too late, even if they would have been good on a motion to suppress; but if called upon to pass upon the sufficiency of the objections, the court is inclined to the opinion that the same are not well taken. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cartter, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The objection to the admissibility of a deposition as evidence in a cause should be made by motion to suppress before going into trial. The objections in this case, therefore, came too late, even if they would have been good on a motion to suppress; but if called upon to pass upon the sufficiency of the objections, the court is inclined to the opinion that the same are not well taken. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 D.C. 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claxton-v-adams-dc-1874.