Clawson v. Lyon
43 A. 1098, 58 N.J. Eq. 584, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 149
This text of 43 A. 1098 (Clawson v. Lyon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clawson v. Lyon, 43 A. 1098, 58 N.J. Eq. 584, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 149 (N.J. 1899).
Opinion
The decree of the court of chancery is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Depue, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Booert, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh—14.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rippel v. King
8 A.2d 777 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
43 A. 1098, 58 N.J. Eq. 584, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clawson-v-lyon-nj-1899.