Clawson v. Lyon
43 A. 1098, 58 N.J. Eq. 584, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 149
Opinion
The decree of the court of chancery is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Depue, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Booert, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh—14.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clawson v. Lyon, 43 A. 1098, 58 N.J. Eq. 584, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 149 (N.J. 1899).
43 A. 1098 (Clawson v. Lyon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rippel v. King
8 A.2d 777 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)