Clavin v. New Orleans Police Department

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Clavin v. New Orleans Police Department

129 So. 2d 100, 1961 La. App. LEXIS 2061

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 24, 1961

DocketNo. 9

StatusPublished

This text of 129 So. 2d 100 (Clavin v. New Orleans Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clavin v. New Orleans Police Department, 129 So. 2d 100, 1961 La. App. LEXIS 2061 (La. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

JANVIER, Judge.

This matter comes before us on motion of plaintiff appellant to remand in order that there may be designated what portions of the record should be incorporated in the transcript.

From the motion it appears that, at various stages before the matter reached this Court, the plaintiff was represented by different attorneys and that, at various times, these attorneys severed their connection with plaintiff and that, therefore, during certain periods he was not represented by counsel, and that, as a result, he was without counsel during the period which was allowed by Rule XXII, section 6, of the Rules of the Supreme Court, which section has now become part of the rules of this Court, and during which designations of the necessary portions of the record must be made, and that, accordingly, no designation of the necessary portions of the record were ever filed by appellant, nor by defendant, City of New Orleans.

In opposition to the motion counsel for the City of New Orleans shows that when the decision of the Civil Service Commission was rendered, notice thereof was sent by registered mail to plaintiff and his then counsel.

[101]*101We see no reason to grant plaintiff an opportunity to designate the necessary portions of the record since he failed to comply with the rule referred to.

The motion to remand is overruled.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JANVIER, Judge.

This matter comes before us on motion of plaintiff appellant to remand in order that there may be designated what portions of the record should be incorporated in the transcript.

From the motion it appears that, at various stages before the matter reached this Court, the plaintiff was represented by different attorneys and that, at various times, these attorneys severed their connection with plaintiff and that, therefore, during certain periods he was not represented by counsel, and that, as a result, he was without counsel during the period which was allowed by Rule XXII, section 6, of the Rules of the Supreme Court, which section has now become part of the rules of this Court, and during which designations of the necessary portions of the record must be made, and that, accordingly, no designation of the necessary portions of the record were ever filed by appellant, nor by defendant, City of New Orleans.

In opposition to the motion counsel for the City of New Orleans shows that when the decision of the Civil Service Commission was rendered, notice thereof was sent by registered mail to plaintiff and his then counsel.

[101]*101We see no reason to grant plaintiff an opportunity to designate the necessary portions of the record since he failed to comply with the rule referred to.

The motion to remand is overruled.

Motion overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 So. 2d 100, 1961 La. App. LEXIS 2061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clavin-v-new-orleans-police-department-lactapp-1961.