Clauson v. State

273 So. 3d 1124
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 8, 2019·No. No. 3D18-425·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cohen v. State, 171 So.3d 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (holding that reversal of probation violation order was not required, despite error in revoking probation on an uncharged violation, where the record separately supported trial court's revocation on a properly-charged violation *1125and it is clear that trial court would have revoked probation and imposed the same sentence absent the uncharged conduct); Ware v. State, 54 So.3d 1074 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). See also Francois v. State, 923 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clauson v. State, 273 So. 3d 1124 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

273 So. 3d 1124 (Clauson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Francois v. State
923 So. 2d 1219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Cohen v. State
171 So. 3d 179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Ware v. State
54 So. 3d 1074 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)