Clauson v. New England Insuranc

254 F.3d 331
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided July 28, 2001·No. 00-1543·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 00-1543 No. 00-1568

JOHN CLAUSON,

Plaintiff, Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

v.

NEW ENGLAND INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant, Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

ERRATA

The opinion of this court issued June 22, 2001, is amended as follows:

On page 12, lines 16-17, replace “Indeed, NEIC conceded at oral argument that the court's interpretation was reasonable.” with the following:

Indeed, at oral argument, while maintaining that the court's interpretation was, from its point of view, incorrect, NEIC also acknowledged that "the meaning works," conceding, in effect, that the reading offered by the district court was a reasonable response to the language of the policy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clauson v. New England Insuranc, 254 F.3d 331 (1st Cir. 2001).

254 F.3d 331 (Clauson v. New England Insuranc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.