Clauson v. New England Insuranc

254 F.3d 331
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedJuly 28, 2001
Docket00-1543
StatusPublished

This text of 254 F.3d 331 (Clauson v. New England Insuranc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clauson v. New England Insuranc, 254 F.3d 331 (1st Cir. 2001).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 00-1543 No. 00-1568

JOHN CLAUSON,

Plaintiff, Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

v.

NEW ENGLAND INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant, Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

ERRATA

The opinion of this court issued June 22, 2001, is amended as follows:

On page 12, lines 16-17, replace “Indeed, NEIC conceded at oral argument that the court's interpretation was reasonable.” with the following:

Indeed, at oral argument, while maintaining that the court's interpretation was, from its point of view, incorrect, NEIC also acknowledged that "the meaning works," conceding, in effect, that the reading offered by the district court was a reasonable response to the language of the policy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 F.3d 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clauson-v-new-england-insuranc-ca1-2001.